The Project Gutenberg eBook of Genera and Subgenera of Chipmunks

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

Title: Genera and Subgenera of Chipmunks

Author: John A. White

Release date: November 23, 2009 [eBook #30533]

Most recently updated: December 15, 2010

Language: English

Other information and formats: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/30533

Credits: Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper, Anne Storer and

the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at

http://www.pgdp.net

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK GENERA AND SUBGENERA OF CHIPMUNKS ***

Genera and Subgenera of Chipmunks

BY

JOHN A. WHITE

University of Kansas Publications

Museum of Natural History

Volume 5, No. 32, pp. 543-561, 12 figures in text

December 1, 1953

University of Kansas

LAWRENCE

1953

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PUBLICATIONS, MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, A. Byron Leonard,

and Robert W. Wilson

Volume 5, No. 32, pp. 543-561, 12 figures in text

December 1, 1953

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS Lawrence, Kansas

PRINTED BY

FERD VOILAND, JR., STATE PRINTER

TOPEKA, KANSAS

1953

Genera and Subgenera of Chipmunks

By

JOHN A. WHITE

CONTENTS

PAGE

Introduction

546

Historical

546

Methods, Materials, and Acknowledgments

547

Evaluation of Characters

548

Characters in which the Subgenera Eutamias

and Neotamias Agree, but Differ from the

Genus Tamias

548

Structure of the Malleus

548

Structure of the Baculum

549

Structure of the Hyoid Apparatus

552

Presence or Absence of P3

553

Length of Tail in Relation to Total Length

553

Color Pattern

554

Characters in which the Subgenus Eutamias

and the Genus Tamias Agree, but Differ

from the Subgenus Neotamias

554

Shape of the Infraorbital Foramen

554

Width of the Postorbital Process at Base

554

Position of the Supraorbital Notch

554

Degree of Convergence of the Upper Tooth-rows

554

Degree of Constriction of the Interorbital Region

555

Shape of the Pinna

555

Structural Features that are too Weakly

Expressed to be of Taxonomic Use

555

Discussion

555

Genera and Subgenera

557

Genus Eutamias Trouessart

557

Subgenus Eutamias Trouessart

558

Subgenus Neotamias Howell

558

Genus Tamias Illiger

559

Discussion

559

Conclusions

560

Literature Cited

561

ILLUSTRATIONS

Figs. 1-3. Dorsomedial Views of Malleus

549

Figs. 4-10. Lateral Views of Baculum

551

Figs. 11-12. Ventral Views of Hyoid Apparatus

552

INTRODUCTION

The supraspecific categories of the chipmunks, as in most other groups of squirrels, have been a source of controversy for many years. Before presenting new evidence and a review of older evidence bearing on the problem, it seems desirable to review briefly in chronological order, the taxonomic history of the genera and subgenera of the chipmunks.

HISTORICAL

Linnaeus (1758:64) described the eastern North American chipmunks under the name Sciurus striatus and based his description on that of Catesby (1743:75). The Asiatic chipmunk was first described, under the name Sciurus sibiricus, by Laxmann (1769:69). Schreber (1785, 4:790) separated the Asiatic and North American chipmunks into the Asiatic and American varieties. Gmelin (1788:50) followed Schreber and, employing trinomials, used the names Sciurus striatus asiaticus and S. s. americanus. Illiger (1811:83) proposed Tamias as the generic name of the chipmunk of eastern North America. Say (1823:45) described Sciurus quadrivittatus, the first species of chipmunk known from western North America.

Trouessart (1880:86-87) proposed Eutamias as the subgeneric name to include the western North American and Asiatic chipmunks.

Merriam (1897:189-190) raised Eutamias to full generic rank. In so doing he neither listed nor described any characters but wrote that “it will be observed that the name Eutamias, proposed by Trouessart in 1880 as a subgenus of Tamias is here adopted as a full genus. This is because of the conviction that the superficial resemblance between the two groups is accidental parallelism, in no way indicative of affinity. In fact the two groups, if my notion of their relationship is correct, had different ancestors, Tamias being an offshoot of the ground-squirrels of the subgenus Ictidomys of Allen, and Eutamias of the subgenus Ammospermophilus, Merriam.”

Howell (1929:23) proposed Neotamias as the subgeneric name for the chipmunks of western North America, of the genus Eutamias.

Ellerman (1940, 1:426) gave Eutamias and Neotamias equal subgeneric rank with Tamias under the genus Tamias; on pages 427-428 he quoted Merriam, as I have done above, and later, after quoting the key to the genera and subgenera of chipmunks of Howell (1929:11), Ellerman wrote (op. cit.: 428-429), “This key convinces me that all these forms must be referred to one genus only. The characters given to separate ‘Eutamias’ from Tamias are based only on the absence or presence of the functionless premolar, and on the colour pattern. If colour pattern is to be used as a generic character, it seems Citellus suslicus will require a new name when compared with C. citellus, etc.” And again, “The Asiatic chipmunk is intermediate between typical Tamias and the small American forms in many characters.” To substantiate this, Ellerman (loc. cit.) quotes Howell (loc. cit.), in comparing the subgenera Eutamias and Neotamias, as follows: “‘the ears [of subgenus Eutamias] are broad, rounded, of medium height, much as in Tamias; postorbital broad at base, tapering to a point, much as in Tamias; interorbital constriction slight, as in Tamias; upper molariform tooth rows slightly convergent posteriorly, as in Tamias.’” Ellerman (loc. cit.) again quotes Howell (loc. cit.), “‘Eutamias of Asia resembles Tamias of North America and differs from American Eutamias in a number of characters, notably the shape of the anteorbital foramen, the postorbital process, the breadth of the interorbital region, the development of the lambdoidal crest, and the shape of the external ears. On the other hand, American Eutamias agrees with the Asiatic members of the genus in the shape of the rostrum, the well-defined striations of the upper incisors, the presence of the extra peg-like premolar, and in the pattern of the dorsal stripes.’”

Bryant (1945:372) wrote, “I am convinced that Ellerman’s interpretation of the relationships of the chipmunks is correct.” After commenting that the presence or absence of P3, “is of significance only in distinguishing between species of squirrels,” Bryant adds that “The other differences between the eastern and the western chipmunks do not appear to be of sufficient phylogenetic importance to warrant the retention of the two groups as genera.”

METHODS, MATERIALS, AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Characters previously mentioned in the literature as having taxonomic worth for supraspecific categories of chipmunks were checked by me on specimens old enough to have worn permanent premolars. Some structural features not previously used were found to have taxonomic significance. The baculum in each of the supraspecific categories of sciurids of North America was examined; the bacula were processed by the method described by White (1951:125) to obviate “variation” caused by shriveling of the smaller bacula or breaking of the more delicate parts of the larger bacula. Mallei and hyoid bones of the genera and subgenera of the chipmunks were mostly studied in the dry state. Part of the hyoid musculature in these same groups of chipmunks was dissected.

In all, I studied more than 1,000 skulls and skins of the subgenus Neotamias, approximately 50 skulls and skins of Tamias striatus, and 15 skulls and skins of the subgenus Eutamias (Eutamias sibiricus asiaticus from Manchuria). Numerous other specimens were examined but not in such detail.

I am grateful to Professor E. Raymond Hall for guidance in the study. For encouragement and advice I am grateful also to Doctors Robert W. Wilson, Cecil G. Lalicker, Edwin C. Galbreath, Keith R. Kelson, E. Lendell Cockrum, Olin L. Webb, and others at the Museum of Natural History, and in the Department of Zoology of the University of Kansas. My wife, Alice M. White, made the drawings and helped me in many other ways. For lending specimens I thank Dr. David H. Johnson of the United States National Museum, and Dr. George C. Rinker of the Department of Anatomy, University of Michigan.

Assistance with field work is acknowledged from the Kansas University Endowment Association, the National Science Foundation, and the United States Navy, Office of Naval Research, through contract No. NR161 791.

EVALUATION OF CHARACTERS

The following paragraphs treat the characters listed by Howell, Ellerman, and Bryant, and such additional characters as I have found useful in characterizing the genera and subgenera of chipmunks. Some of the findings, I think, illustrate how study of such mammalian structures as the baculum, malleus, and hyoid apparatus—structures that seem to be little influenced by the changing external environment—clarifies relationships, if these previously were estimated only from other parts of the anatomy of Recent specimens.

The structural features and characters to be discussed, or listed, below may be arranged in three categories as follows: 1) Characters in which the subgenera Eutamias and Neotamias agree but are different from the genus Tamias; 2) Characters in which the subgenus Eutamias and the genus Tamias agree but are different from the subgenus Neotamias; 3) Structural features that are too weakly expressed to be of taxonomic use.

CHARACTERS IN WHICH THE SUBGENERA EUTAMIAS AND NEOTAMIAS AGREE, BUT DIFFER FROM THE GENUS TAMIAS

Structure of the Malleus.—The malleus in chipmunks is composed of a head and neck, a manubrium which has a spatulate process at the end opposite the head, and a muscular process situated about halfway between the spatulate process and the head of the malleus. An articular facet begins on the manubrium near the neck and spirals halfway around the head of the malleus. A lamina extends from the anterior edge of the head and neck, tapers to a point and joins the tympanic bulla anteriorly where there is a suture between the lamina and bulla. The lamina is one half as long as the rest of the malleus (see figs. 1-3).

The head of the malleus in Tamias is clearly more elongated than in Eutamias. The plane formed by the lamina in Eutamias makes an angle of approximately 90 degrees with the plane formed by the manubrium; in Tamias the two planes make an angle of approximately 60 degrees.

Examination of series of mallei of Eutamias and Tamias indicate that there is slight individual variation, slight variation with age, and no secondary sexual variation. Intraspecific variation in the subgenus Neotamias is slight, consisting of differences in size. Specimens of the subgenus Eutamias from Manchuria have mallei which are morphologically close to the mallei of the subgenus Neotamias.

FIGS. 1-3. Dorsomedial views of left malleus.

FIG. 1. Tamias striatus lysteri, No. 11920 sex?; from Carroll Co., New Hampshire.

FIG. 2. Eutamias sibiricus asiaticus, No. 199637 male NM; from I-mien-po, N. Kirin, Manchuria.

FIG. 3. Eutamias townsendii senex, No. 165 male; from Lake Tahoe, California.

Structure of the Baculum.—In discussing the baculum in Eutamias and Tamias, it seems desirable to do so in the light of the structure of the baculum in other sciurids.

The bacula of North American sciurids are divisible into six distinct types represented by those of the genera Spermophilus, Marmota, Sciurus, Tamiasciurus, Eutamias, and Glaucomys.

The type of baculum in Spermophilus is spoonshaped with a ventral process that is spinelike or keellike. Also, spines usually are present along the margin of the “spoon.” The base (proximal end) of the baculum is broad, and some species have a winglike process extending dorsally and partly covering a longitudinal groove. The shaft is more or less curved downward in the middle (see figs. 7, 10).

In Marmota the baculum is greatly enlarged at the posterior end and forms a shieldlike surface. The ventral surface of the base is flattened and the ventral surface of the shaft curves slightly ventrally then dorsally to the tip. The dorsal region of the base culminates in a point, from which there is a ridge that extends anteriorly and that tapers rapidly into the shaft near the tip. The tip, dorsally, has a slight depression surrounded by knobs, which are more or less well defined, and which resemble, topographically, the spines described for Spermophilus (see fig. 8).

In Sciurus the baculum is semispoonshaped and asymmetrical. There is a winglike process on one side and a spine, which projects lateroventrally, on the other side of the tip. The base of the baculum is broad but not so broad as in most species of Spermophilus. Extending posteriorly from the region of the tip, at which point a spine projects lateroventrally, there is a ridge, which is often partly ossified and that extends to a point near the base (see fig. 4).

In Tamiasciurus the baculum is absent or vestigial (Layne, 1952:457-459).

In Eutamias the baculum is broad at the base and the shaft tapers distally to the junction of the shaft and tip, or the base is only slightly wider than any part of the shaft. The tip often forms an abrupt angle with the shaft and there is a keel on the dorsal surface of the tip (see figs. 5, 6).

The baculum in Glaucomys is the most distinctive of that of any American sciurid. According to Pocock (1923:243-244), “The baculum [of G. volans] is exceedingly long and slender, slightly sinuous in its proximal third, and inclined slightly upwards distally. The extreme apex is bifid, the lower process being rounded, the upper more pointed. On the left side there is a long crest running from the summit of the upper terminal process and ending abruptly behind the left side about one-third of the distance from the proximal end of the bone. It lies over a well-marked groove, and there is a second shallower groove on the right side of the bone.” The baculum of G. sabrinus is markedly wider, more flattened and shorter than in G. volans. The crest, which is also present in G. volans, starts from the upper terminal process and extends to the base of the baculum on the left side. There is a knoblike process on the crest at a point three fourths the length of the baculum from its base. The distal one third of the baculum curves sharply but smoothly upwards (see fig. 9).

Keeping in mind that the baculum in the North American sciurids can be classified into six structural groups, as given above, the baculum in each of the subgenera Eutamias and Neotamias and in the genus Tamias is briefly described.

In the subgenus Neotamias the baculum resembles a leg and foot of man, with a narrow ridge (keel) in the center of the “instep” of the foot (Howell 1929:27). The tip (=foot) curves dorsally at the distal end (see figs. 5, 6).

FIGS. 4-10. Lateral views of right side (except left-lateral view in fig. 9) of baculum.

FIG. 4. Sciurus aureogaster aureogaster, No. 37000; from 70 km. S C. Victoria (by highway), and 6 km. W of highway, Tamaulipas.

FIG. 5. Eutamias quadrimaculatus, No. 95780 BS; from Mountains near Quincy, Plumas Co., California.

FIG. 6. Eutamias sibiricus asiaticus, No. 199632 NM; from 120 mi. up the Yalu River, Korea.

FIG. 7. Tamias striatus lysteri, No. 193493 NM; from Locust Grove, New York.

FIG. 8. Marmota flaviventer dacota, No. 41641; from 1½ mi. E Buckhorn, 6,150 ft., Weston Co., Wyoming.

FIG. 9. Glaucomys sabrinus bangsi, No. 15079; from 10 mi. NE Pinedale, 8,000 ft., Sublette Co., Wyoming.

FIG. 10. Spermophilus armatus, No. 14888; from W end Half Moon Lake, 7,900 ft., Sublette Co., Wyoming.

In the subgenus Eutamias, the baculum “tapers gradually from base to tip, the distal portion upturned in an even curve and slightly flattened ...” (op. cit.:26). Microscopic examination reveals that there is a faint keel on the dorsal surface of the tip.

Eutamias, like Callosciurus, Menetes, Dremomys, Lariscus, Rhinosciurus, and Nannosciurus, has a keel on the dorsal surface of the tip of the baculum (compare figures 5 and 6 with the descriptions and figures in Pocock, 1923:217-225).

In Tamias the baculum is “a slender bone 4.5-5 millimeters in length, nearly straight, upturned at the tip and slightly expanded into the shape of a narrow spoon or scoop, with a slight median ridge on the under surface.” (Howell op. cit.:13.) The “median ridge” is a keel on the ventral surface. In having a keel on the ventral surface of the tip, the baculum of Tamias is comparable to that of Spermophilus.

Examination of series of bacula of the subgenus Neotamias and the genus Tamias indicates, as in the case of the mallei, that there is slight individual variation and slight variation with age. In the subgenus Neotamias interspecific variation in the baculum is considerable, but the general plan of structure remains constant. From this study of variation of the baculum in American chipmunks, it can be extrapolated that the baculum in the Asiatic Eutamias would show little individual variation in structure. I have seen only two bacula of the Asiatic Eutamias.

FIGS. 11-12. Ventral views of the hyoid apparatus in Tamias and Eutamias.

FIG. 11. Tamias striatus venustus, No. 11072 female; from Winslow, Washington Co., Arkansas.

FIG. 12. Eutamias minimus operarius, No. 5376 male; from 14 mi. N El Rito, Rio Arriba Co., New Mexico.

Structure of the Hyoid Apparatus.—The hyoid apparatus in the chipmunks is made up of an arched basihyal with a thyrohyal attached to each limb of this “arch.” To each junction between the “arch” and the thyrohyals, a hypohyal is attached by ligaments to a flat articular surface. A ceratohyal then is attached posteriorly to the hypohyal and a stylohyal ligament is attached to each ceratohyal posteriorly. The stylohyal is loosely attached along its sides to the tympanic bulla and finally attached, at the posterior end, to the bulla at a point slightly ventral and posterior to the auditory meatus.

In the genus Eutamias the hypohyal and ceratohyal are completely fused in adults, the suture between these two bones being visible in juvenal specimens (see fig. 12).

In the genus Tamias the hypohyal and ceratohyal remain distinct throughout life. The hypohyal may frequently be divided into two parts, a variation which is also present in Marmota.

The musculature associated with the hyoid apparatus in Eutamias and Tamias is as described by Bryant (1945:310, 316) for the Nearctic squirrels. However, the conjoining tendon of the anterior and posterior pairs of digastric muscles is ribbonlike in Eutamias and rodlike (rounded in cross section) in Tamias.

The presence or absence of P3 and the projection of the anterior root of P4 in relation to the masseteric knob.—Only rarely is P3 absent in Eutamias or present in Tamias. P3 in specimens of old adult Eutamias, shows wear, thus suggesting that P3 is functional in older chipmunks. In Eutamias, which normally has a P3, the anterior root of P4 projects to the outside of the masseteric knob, whereas in Tamias, which normally lacks a P3, the anterior root of P4 projects directly to the masseteric knob or to the lingual side of this structure. The projection of the anterior root of P4 seems to be correlated with the presence or absence of P3. However, in a specimen of Tamias striatus rufescens (No. 11117 KU), the left P3 is present, yet the anterior root of P4 still projects to the lingual side of the masseteric knob.

Ellerman (1940:48) and Bryant (1945:368-369, 372) think that the presence or absence of P3 is not of generic significance in chipmunks, since P3 is vestigial and probably is in the process of being lost, and since this character is rarely used as a generic character in other sciurids. I think that the presence or absence of P3, together with the projection of the anterior root of P4 in relation to the masseteric knob, is of generic significance, for, squirrels in general have retained the dentition and dental formula of a primitive rodent, and any change in the pattern of the teeth or in dental formula is, in my opinion, of a fundamental nature.

Length of tail in relation to total length.—The tail in Eutamias is more than 40 per cent of the total length, whereas in Tamias the tail is less than 38 per cent of the total length. In this respect Tamias resembles most ground squirrels of the genus Spermophilus.

Color pattern.—The chipmunks vary but little in color pattern, for, even in Eutamias dorsalis, which is one of the most aberrant of the chipmunks in color pattern, the pattern is characteristic of Eutamias.

The width of the longitudinal stripes is uniform in Eutamias whereas in Tamias the dorsal, longitudinal light stripes are more than twice as wide as the other stripes.

In Eutamias, only the two lateralmost dark stripes are short, whereas in Tamias all four of the lateral dark stripes are short; none extends to the rump or to the shoulder.

The dark median stripe is present in both Eutamias and Tamias as well as in other genera such as Callosciurus and Menetes (Ellerman 1940:390).

CHARACTERS IN WHICH THE SUBGENUS EUTAMIAS AND THE GENUS TAMIAS AGREE,

BUT DIFFER FROM THE SUBGENUS NEOTAMIAS

Shape of the infraorbital foramen.—In the subgenus Eutamias and in the genus Tamias the infraorbital foramen is rounded, whereas in most species of the subgenus Neotamias the foramen is slitlike. In Eutamias townsendii, however, the infraorbital foramen is rounded as much as in the subgenus Eutamias and in the genus Tamias.

Width of the postorbital process at base.—The postorbital process is broader at the base in the subgenus Eutamias and in the genus Tamias than in most species of the subgenus Neotamias. In E. townsendii, however, this process is relatively as broad as in the subgenus Eutamias and in the genus Tamias.

Position of the supraorbital notch in relation to the posterior notch of the zygomatic plate.—In the subgenus Eutamias and in the genus Tamias the supraorbital notch is distinctly anterior to the posterior notch of the zygomatic plate, whereas in the subgenus Neotamias, the supraorbital notch is only slightly anterior to the posterior notch of the zygomatic plate. This difference may be correlated with differences in size, since specimens of the subgenus Eutamias and the genus Tamias are larger than specimens of the subgenus Neotamias.

Degree of convergence of the upper tooth-rows.—The rows of upper cheek-teeth converge posteriorly in the subgenus Eutamias and in the genus Tamias, except that in some specimens of E. sibiricus asiaticus the rows of upper cheek-teeth are nearly parallel to each other. In most species of the subgenus Neotamias the rows of upper cheek-teeth are nearly parallel to each other, although in the specimens that I have seen of E. townsendii, the upper rows of cheek-teeth converge posteriorly.

Degree of constriction of the interorbital region.—The interorbital region is more constricted in most species of the subgenus Neotamias than in the subgenus Eutamias and the genus Tamias. In specimens of E. t. townsendii of the subgenus Neotamias, however, the degree of constriction of the interorbital region is approximately the same as in the subgenus Eutamias and the genus Tamias.

Shape of the pinna.—The pinna is narrower and more pointed in the subgenus Neotamias than in the subgenus Eutamias and the genus Tamias.

STRUCTURAL FEATURES THAT ARE TOO WEAKLY EXPRESSED TO BE OF TAXONOMIC USE

The following alleged characters have been mentioned in the literature. Since the degree of expression of these features is so slight, or since there is marked variation within one or more natural groups of chipmunks, no reliance is here placed on these features. They are as follows: (1) Degree of the posterior projection of the palate; (2) relative size of the auditory bullae; (3) position, in relation to P4, of the notch in the posterior edge of the zygomatic plate; (4) size of m3 in relation to m2; (5) degree of development of the mesoconid and ectolophid of the lower molars; (6) shape and length of the rostrum; (7) degree of distinctness of minute longitudinal grooves on the upper incisors.

A variation that does not readily fall in any one of the three categories mentioned above is the degree of development of the lambdoidal crest. The crest is least developed in the subgenus Neotamias and most developed in the genus Tamias. The larger the skull, the more the lambdoidal crest is developed; seemingly, therefore, the degree of development is an expression of size of the skull and may be determined by heterogonic growth.

DISCUSSION

As shown in table 1, there are ten characters by means of which Eutamias and Tamias can be separated consistently. The subgenus Eutamias occurs on the Asiatic side and the subgenus Neotamias occurs on the North American side of Bering Strait, yet the two subgenera agree in the ten features referred to. Although the subgenus Neotamias and the genus Tamias occur together in parts of the United States and Canada, they differ in the ten features, indicating that the subgenera Eutamias and Neotamias are more closely related to each other than either is to Tamias.

TABLE 1.—CHARACTERS BY MEANS OF WHICH THE GENERA EUTAMIAS AND TAMIAS CAN BE DISTINGUISHED

Character

Eutamias

Tamias

Shape of head of malleus.

not elongated.

elongated.

Angle formed by planes of lamina and manubrium of malleus.

approximately 90 degrees.

approximately 60 degrees.

Position of keel on tip of baculum.

dorsal.

ventral.

Relation of hypohyal and ceratohyal bones of hyoid apparatus.

fused in adults.

never fused.

Appearance in cross section of conjoining tendon of anterior and posterior digastric muscles.

flattened.

rounded.

Presence or absence of P3.

present.

absent.

Projection of anterior root of P4 in relation to masseteric knob.

buccal.

lingual.

Length of tail in relation to total length.

more than 40 per cent.

less than 38 per cent.

Width of longitudinal stripes.

subequal.

median pair of light stripes twice as wide as others.

Length of lateral longitudinal light stripes.

outermost pair short.

both pairs short.

It must be pointed out here that the subgenus Neotamias always differs from both the subgenus Eutamias and the genus Tamias in pointed versus rounded pinna of ear (see table 2) and in the supraorbital notch being slightly posterior to or even with, instead of distinctly anterior to, the posterior notch of the zygomatic plate. The relative position of these two notches, however, seems to be a matter of relative (heterogonic) growth. Further, the base of the postorbital process of the frontal usually is narrower (relative to the length of the process) in the subgenus Neotamias but there is a gradation in this feature in Neotamias culminating in the species E. townsendii in which the bases of the processes are relatively as broad as in the subgenus Eutamias and the genus Tamias. The same condition obtains in the shape of the infraorbital foramen which is subovate to rounded in the subgenus Neotamias and always rounded in the other chipmunks.

TABLE 2.—CHARACTERS BY MEANS OF WHICH THE SUBGENUS EUTAMIAS AND THE GENUS TAMIAS MAY BE DISTINGUISHED FROM THE SUBGENUS NEOTAMIAS

Character

subgenus

Neotamias

subgenus

Eutamias

genus

Tamias

Shape of infraorbital foramen.

subovate to rounded.

always rounded.

always rounded.

Relative width of the postorbital process at base.

narrow to broad.

broad.

broad.

Position of supraorbital notch in relation to posterior notch of zygomatic plate.

even with or slightly posterior.

anterior.

anterior.

Convergence, posteriorly, of upper tooth-rows.

not always.

not always.

always.

Degree of constriction of interorbital region.

slight to marked.

marked.

marked.

Shape of pinna.

long and pointed.

broad and rounded.

broad and rounded.

These differences of Neotamias are so slight in comparison with the similarities (ten features mentioned above) that Neotamias here is accorded only subgeneric rank under the genus Eutamias, instead of generic rank.

Howell’s (1929) arrangement of the genera and subgenera of chipmunks is judged to be correct as indicated by the following arrangement that I propose.

GENERA AND SUBGENERA

Genus Eutamias Trouessart

Eutamias Trouessart, E. L. Catal. Mamm. viv. et foss., Rodentia, in Bull. Soc. d’Etudes Sci. d’Angers, 10:86-87, 1880. Type Sciurus striatus asiaticus Gmelin.

Eutamias, Merriam, C. H., Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 11:189-190, July 1, 1897.

Eutamias, Howell, A. H., N. Amer. Fauna, 52:26, November 30, 1929.

Tamias, Ellerman, J. R., The families and genera of living rodents. British Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1:426, June 8, 1940.

Tamias, Bryant, M. D., Amer. Midland Nat., 33:732, March 1945.

Diagnosis.—Skull lightly built, narrow; postorbital process light and weak; lacrimal not elongated; infraorbital foramen lacks canal, relatively larger than in most sciurids; P3 present; head of malleus not elongated; plane of manubrium of malleus 90 degrees to plane of lamina; hypohyal and ceratohyal bones of hyoid apparatus fused in adults; conjoining tendon between anterior and posterior sets of digastric muscles ribbonlike; keel on dorsal side of tip of baculum; tail more than 40 per cent of total length; five longitudinal dark stripes evenly spaced and subequal in width; two lateral dark stripes short.

Subgenus Eutamias Trouessart

Eutamias Trouessart, E. L. Catal. Mamm. viv. et foss., Rodentia, in Bull. Soc. d’Etudes Sci. d’Angers 10:86-87, 1880. Type Sciurus striatus asiaticus Gmelin.

Eutamias, Howell, A. H., N. Amer. Fauna, 52:26, November 30, 1929.

Eutamias, Ellerman, J. R., The families and genera of living rodents. British Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1:426, June 8, 1940.

Eutamias, Bryant, M. D., Amer. Midland Nat. 33:732, March 1945.

Diagnosis.—Size large; lambdoidal crest moderately developed; supraorbital notches distinctly anterior to posterior notch of zygomatic plate; baculum with faint keel on dorsal surface of tip which curves upward; pelage coarse; ears broad, rounded, of medium height.

Geographic range.—Palearctic. West to Dvina and Kama rivers, Vologda, and Kazan, in European Russia. South to southern Ural Mountains, Altai Mountains; Kansu, Szechwan, Shensi, Shansi, and Chihli provinces of China; Manchuria and Korea. East to Hokkaido Island, Japan; Kunashiri Island, southern Kurile Islands; Sakhalin Island, and Yakutsk, Siberia. North nearly to Arctic Coast in Siberia and European Russia (Ellerman and Morrison-Scott 1951:503).

Subgenus Neotamias Howell

Neotamias Howell, A. H., N. Amer. Fauna, 52:26, November 30, 1929. Type, Eutamias merriami J. A. Allen [=Tamias asiaticus merriami J. A. Allen].

Neotamias, Ellerman, J. R., The families and genera of living rodents. British Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1:426, June 8, 1940.

Neotamias, Bryant, M. D., Amer. Midland Nat., 33:372, March, 1945.

Diagnosis.—Size small to medium; lambdoidal crest barely discernible; supraorbital notches even with, or posterior to, posterior notch of zygomatic plate; baculum with distinct keel on dorsal surface of tip which curves upward; pelage silky; ears long and pointed.

Geographic range.—Western Nearctic. West to Pacific Coast. South to Lat. 20°30' in Baja California and to northwestern Durango and southeastern Coahuila, Mexico. East to eastern New Mexico, westernmost Oklahoma, eastern Colorado, Wyoming, northwestern Nebraska, western and northwestern South Dakota, western and northwestern North Dakota, northeastern Minnesota, northern Wisconsin and Upper Peninsula of Michigan, and eastern Ontario. North to southwestern shore of Hudson Bay, southern shore of Great Slave Lake and Yukon River, Yukon.

Genus Tamias Illiger

Tamias Illiger, J. K. W., Prodromus Syst. Mam. Avium, pp. 83, 1811. Type, Sciurus striatus Linnaeus.

Tamias, Howell, A. H., N. Amer. Fauna, 52:26, November 30, 1929.

Tamias, Ellerman, J. R., The families and genera of living rodents. British Mus. (Nat. Hist.), 1:426, June 8, 1940.

Tamias, Bryant, M. D., Amer. Midland Nat. 33:372, March, 1945.

Diagnosis.—Skull lightly built, narrow; postorbital process small and weak; lacrimal not elongated; infraorbital foramen lacks canal, relatively larger than in most sciurids; P3 absent; head of malleus elongated; plane of manubrium of malleus forms 60 degree angle with plane of lamina; hypohyal and ceratohyal bones of hyoid apparatus fused in adults; conjoining tendon of anterior and posterior digastric muscles rounded in cross section; keel on ventral surface of tip which curves upward in baculum; tail less than 38 per cent of total length; five longitudinal dark and four longitudinal light stripes present but two dorsal light stripes at least twice as broad as other stripes; four lateral dark stripes short.

Geographic range.—Eastern Nearctic. West to Turtle Mountains, North Dakota; eastern North Dakota, eastern South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma. South to southern Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, northwestern Georgia. East to Atlantic Coast from South Carolina to Nova Scotia. North to northeastern Quebec and southern tip of Hudson Bay.

DISCUSSION

Chipmunks are small striped squirrels that inhabit the Holarctic Realm and that are found in similar niches in each of the three regions: Palearctic, western Nearctic, and eastern Nearctic. Ellerman (1940) and Bryant (1945) placed the chipmunks in three subgenera, corresponding to the regions mentioned above, under the one genus Tamias. Critical examination of new and old evidence reveals, nevertheless, that the subgenera Eutamias and Neotamias of the genus Eutamias are more closely related to one another than either is to the genus Tamias. This relationship can be seen clearly in the structure of the malleus, baculum, hyoid apparatus, hyoid musculature, the presence or absence of P3, the projection of the anterior root of P4 in relation to the masseteric knob, and in the color pattern.

Because the genera Eutamias and Tamias occupy similar ecological niches, the structural similarities that permit these animals to be called chipmunks, show convergence, and thus can be assumed to be adaptive. These similarities are in the molars, in shape of the skull, in color pattern and in other features which have been used by many systematists to interpret the phylogenetic relationships of the squirrels. Pocock (1923:211), however, reviewed the taxonomic literature on sciurids and wrote: “The conclusion very forcibly suggested by the literature of the subject is the untrustworthiness of such characters.” Pocock (op. cit.), correctly in my opinion, then established a supraspecific classification of the sciurids based almost exclusively on the structure of the baculum and glans penis. I have studied the baculum in chipmunks and in all the major supraspecific groups of Nearctic squirrels. The bacula of the Nearctic squirrels and those of the Palearctic and Indian squirrels, other than the chipmunks, are described and figured by Pocock (op. cit.).

The baculum in Eutamias, in general plan of structure, resembles the baculum in the genera Callosciurus, Menetes, Rhinosciurus, Lariscus, Dremomys, and Nannosciurus, of the tribe Callosciurini Simpson. The baculum in Tamias, in general plan of structure, resembles that in Spermophilus (=Citellus) and Cynomys of the tribe Marmotini Simpson. These tribes, designated by Simpson (1945:79), are based on the corresponding subfamilies defined by Pocock (1923:239-240) primarily on differences in the structure of the baculum. I assign Tamias to the tribe Marmotini. I assign Eutamias to the tribe Callosciurini, but do so only tentatively because I have not, at first hand, studied the bacula of most of the Callosciurini. The fossil record is too incomplete to reveal the time when the two tribes diverged. The subgenera Eutamias and Neotamias are closely related. Indications are that the divergence of the two subgenera occurred, geologically, but a short time ago, possibly in Pleistocene time.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Eutamias and Tamias are distinct genera of chipmunks.

2. The subgenera Eutamias and Neotamias are valid, for, Eutamias sibiricus differs from all the species of the subgenus Neotamias to a greater degree than these species differ from one another.

3. The genera Eutamias and Tamias probably evolved from two distinct lines of sciurids; one line (Eutamias) is represented by the tribe Callosciurini, and the other (Tamias) by the tribe Marmotini.

LITERATURE CITED

CATESBY, M.

1743. The natural history of Carolina, Florida, and the Bahama Islands, etc., 2:i-xliv, 1-20, 1-100.

ELLERMAN, J. R.

1940. The families and genera of living rodents. British Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Vol. 1, pp. xxvi + 689, 189 figs., June 8.

ELLERMAN, J. R., and T. C. S. MORRISON-SCOTT.

1951. Checklist of Palearctic and Indian mammals. British Mus. (Nat. Hist.), pp. 1-810, 1 map, November 30.

GMELIN, J. F.

1788. Systema Naturae. 1:1-500.

HOWELL, A. H.

1929. Revision of the American chipmunks (genera Tamias and Eutamias). N. Amer. Fauna 52:1-157, 10 pls., 9 maps, November 30.

ILLIGER, J. K. W.

1811. Prodromus systematis mammalium et avium additis terminis zoographicis utriuque classis, pp. xviii + 302, C. Salfeld.

LAXMANN, M. E.

1769. Sibiriche Brief, pp. iv + 104, Gottingen and Gotha.

LAYNE, J. N.

1952. The os genitale of the red squirrel, Tamiasciurus. Jour. Mamm. 33:457-459, 1 fig., November 19.

LINNAEUS, C.

1758. Systema Naturae. 1:1-824.

MERRIAM, C. H.

1897. Notes on the chipmunks of the genus Eutamias occurring west of the east base of the Cascade-Sierra system, with descriptions of new forms. Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 11:189-212, July 1.

POCOCK, R. I.

1923. The classification of the Sciuridae. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1923:209-246, June.

SAY, T. (in Edwin James).

1823. Account of an expedition from Pittsburgh to the Rocky Mountains, performed in the years 1819 and 1820, under the command of Major Stephen H. Long. From the notes of Major Long, Mr. T. Say, and other gentlemen of the exploring party. Compiled by Edwin James. Vol. 1, pp. 1-503; Vol. 2, pp. 1-442 + appendix i-xcviii.

SCHREBER, J. C. D.

1785. Saugthiere, 4:790-802.

SIMPSON, G. G.

1945. The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 85:xvi + 350, October 5.

TROUESSART, E. L.

1880. Catalogue des mammiferes vivants et fossiles. Ordre des Rongeurs. Bull. Soc. d’Etudes Sci. d’Angers, 10:58-212.

WHITE, J. A.

1951. A practical method for mounting the bacula of small mammals. Jour. Mamm. 32:125, February 15.

Transmitted June 26, 1953.

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK GENERA AND SUBGENERA OF CHIPMUNKS ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG™ LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg electronic works provided that:

- • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”

- • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.

- • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.

- • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg

Project Gutenberg is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 41 Watchung Plaza #516, Montclair NJ 07042, USA, +1 (862) 621-9288. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

Table of Contents

Genera and Subgenera of Chipmunks

JOHN A. WHITE

Genera and Subgenera of Chipmunks

Introduction

Historical

Methods, Materials, and Acknowledgments

Evaluation of Characters

Characters in which the Subgenera Eutamias and Neotamias Agree, but Differ from the Genus Tamias

Characters in which the Subgenus Eutamias and the Genus Tamias Agree, but Differ from the Subgenus Neotamias

Structural Features that are too Weakly Expressed to be of Taxonomic Use

Discussion

Table 1.—Characters by Means of Which the Genera Eutamias and Tamias Can Be Distinguished

Table 2.—Characters by Means of Which the Subgenus Eutamias and the Genus Tamias May Be Distinguished from the Subgenus Neotamias

Genera and Subgenera

Discussion

Conclusions

Literature Cited

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG™ LICENSE